An open letter to the Boise Advertising Federation

Over the past few years, I’ve taken the Boise Advertising Federation to task a number of times, but I’ve also given them what I’d consider to be a number of free passes. In this case, it’s the former.

From the BAF website:

The Boise Advertising Federation is the professional development organization for advertising professional in the Boise metro area.

Now, from the Boise Advertising Federation’s Articles of Incorporation:

The purpose or purposes for which the corporation is organized is to provide an educational and fraternal organization for the betterment of the field of advertising. To increase the understanding of advertising and its role among public life. To provide fellowship and culture among persons of the advertising profession.

So, my first question to the current board of the Boise Advertising Federation: What are you doing to provide an educational and fraternal organization for the betterment of the field of advertising? The guest speakers at the occasional luncheon is a good start, but what about those times in between? Where are the regular updates to the website? The newsletters? The articles that members may find interesting? Shouldn’t that be part of the “betterment of the field of advertising”?

Second question: How are you increasing the understanding of advertising and its role among public life? There may very well be some outstanding educational programs happening, but unless people know about them, their effectiveness is severely limited. Now granted, I know that the golf tournament last fall raised some money for the Boise State University and University of Idaho advertising clubs, but is that really enough? How often does someone from the Ad Fed go speak to those clubs? How often are those club members invited to events hosted and/or sponsored by the Boise Ad Fed?

Third question: Fellowship and culture among persons of the advertising profession? Now once again I’ll give credit to the occasional luncheon or social event as an opportunity for those in the advertising profession to get together, but is that really enough?

Fourth question: Why isn’t the Idaho Chapter of the Public Relations Society of America more involved with the Boise Ad Fed, or vice versa? Shouldn’t those same public relations professionals that are part of the PRSA be involved in the BAF also?

Now, should you think that this entire post is an attack on the Boise Ad Fed, it isn’t. It is just as much the responsibility of the members to get involved in the activities of the organization. That being said, however, the BAF has made it very difficult for anyone who may want to get involved to actually do so. On the current website, which has been under construction for god only knows how long now, there is no way for a potential member or interested party to learn more about the group, other than a phone number and an email address, that based on past experience, rarely gets checked.

Have I ever tried to call the phone number? No. What’s the incentive to do so? To try and get involved with a group that doesn’t seem to be doing much, given the outward appearance of their site?

Now, let’s look at it from another point of view — that of the prospective talent thinking about moving to Boise. If I were in their shoes, I’d be extremely leery about considering moving to Boise. Again, given the outward appearance of the organization on the website, it doesn’t seem that there’s anything worth moving to Boise for.

And what about a client looking to hire a Boise agency? Given the fact that the Boise Advertising Federation is supposed to represent the advertising profession, I’d imagine that a potential client would be incredibly put off by the way that the profession is represented locally, and instead would be inclined to look outside of the market to areas such as San Francisco, Portland or Seattle for an agency that can provide the services that they need.

At the end of the day, the Boise Ad Fed should be bringing greater visibility locally, regionally and nationally to the talent that this market has to offer. And there is quite a bit of talent in this market. Instead, though, it seems that the only purpose as of late is to serve as the gatekeeper to any regional or national ADDY awards shows. If you want to enter on a regional or national level, you must enter locally first.

I’m not alone in these concerns about the BAF. I’ve received comments from others expressing many of these same concerns. And again, my intention is not to lay blame on the organization, or lash out at them publicly. But these are valid concerns, and they’re being expressed by BAF members.

So, my challenge to you, the reader, is this:

If you’re a member of the Boise Ad Fed, get more involved. Call up the current President and ask what the group has been up to. Attend an event. Ask for more frequent email updates. Poke and prod the leadership into action, if need be.

If you’re an officer of the Boise Ad Fed, don’t wait for your members to poke and prod you into action. Be proactive. Send out updates on the Rockie Awards, brag about work that members, and member agencies have done recently. Get more people involved. Make the Boise Advertising Federation, and the website in particular, into the hub of activity that it deserves to be.

Also, be sure to take a look at Bart Cleveland’s take on advertising organizations over at the Ad Age Small Agency Diary.

And of course, everyone is welcome to tell me that I’m wrong, right, or just completely full of shit. Comment away.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Are changes in the air?

A couple of recent job opening have got me wondering — are changes in the air?

More specifically, within the past week I’ve seen an opening with the Idaho Lottery for a Marketing Director, and a Marketing Manager for the Boise Hawks Baseball Club.

Now the realist in me says that I’m reading way too much into things, but I have to at least pose the question. I’ve seen it happen entirely too many times in the past — a new marketing manager or director joins an organization, has their own opinions and personal favorites as to which agency they’d like to work with, and ends up yanking the account from the incumbent agency.

Will that happen with the Idaho Lottery? Doubtful. Within the past year they went through the entire RFP process and renewed their relationship with Drake Cooper. If I remember correctly, though, there were a few stipulations in the RFP guidelines that could open it back up again — one of which was a change in agency ownership / management or a change in leadership at the Lottery office (Disclaimer – I’m going off of memory here, so I could very well be mistaken).

The Boise Hawks? Well, that’s another story all together. Since the opening is not for the Director of Marketing, but rather someone that reports to the Director, it doesn’t seem as likely that this account would change hands, but then again, you never know.

So, the moral of the story — if you’re the incumbent, by all means don’t just sit back and expect business as usual. If you want to keep them, you’re going to have to defend your accounts virorously. And on the flip side, if you’re looking to pick off one of these accounts, this may be your best shot at doing so.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

In your opinion…

What do you think is going to be the biggest issue facing agencies in Idaho this year?

Will it be finding and retaining clients? Growing the agency? Adapting to changes in technology?

Or will it be something entirely different? I’ve got my opinion, of course, but I’d like to hear yours.

Comment away.

Technorati tags: ,

Where do you draw the line?

At what point to you make the distinction between an individual doing work for a client, and an agency as it’s own entity doing work for a client?

Is it when the business becomes its own legal entity? If so, there’s a whole helluva lot more links that I need to add to the list.

Is it when the business becomes a brand, and that brand takes on a life of its own? If that’s the case, who gets to decide? Me? I think not. My opinions are just that. Opinions.

So, I throw the question out there to you, dear readers…where do you draw the line?

When the heart and soul leaves the room

Too often, in small agencies, there are one or two key people that drive the focus of an entire business. These people are the heart and soul of the business. Put another way, these people are “the agency.”

Recently, though, I’ve noticed a number of instances where the heart and soul of the business has left the building.

Take Blueline Grassroots Marketing, for example.

Just under a month ago, one of the founders of the company, Brian Critchfield, decided it was time to leave. Blueline was, by my own observations, his baby. He, along with others, started it, and grew it from it’s original group to the place that they’re at today. Then, in what I’d assume was not a sudden decision, he left. He decided that it was time to move on.

Now I’m sure there are a number of reasons for this, many of which you and I will never know about. That’s the case no matter when this happens. The point, however, is that in many ways, Brian was the heart and soul of Blueline. And with him gone, what’s next for them?

Now, it should be noted that this is not unique to our little world here in Idaho. For those of you who follow the new media/marketing world may know, last week CC Chapman decided that it was time for him to leave Crayon, a company that he helped to create. Again, I’m sure there are a number of reasons for this decision that the casual observer will never know about, but I have to call it as I see it — the heart and soul of that company has now left the building.

So, the question remains. When this happens where you’re at, and at some point in time it will happen, what are you going to do about it? Are you in a position to replace the talent that just left the company, or are you going to have to scramble to try and pick up the slack somehow?

As always, comments, questions, blatant cries that I’m full of shit are always welcome.

Technorati tags: , , , ,